In re Christopher H. CA4/3
This is an appeal by G.T. (the mother) of dependent children Christopher H., Jr., and Emilia H. (collectively the children) after the juvenile court terminated parental rights. She argues the court erred by failing to invoke Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i), the so-called “benefit exception” to termination of parental rights. The court found that although she met the first requirement for this exception to apply, regular visitation and contact, she did not meet the second: demonstrating that the children would be greatly harmed if parental ties were severed. We find no error and therefore affirm the orders.
Comments on In re Christopher H. CA4/3