In re C.B. CA3
M.B., father of the minor C.B., appeals from the juvenile court’s September 20, 2017 order selecting adoption as the permanent plan for C.B. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 395, 366.26.) Father’s sole contention is that notice pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) was insufficient. We agree and therefore, reverse the September 20, 2017 order and remand the matter for the limited purpose of permitting the juvenile court to comply with the notice provisions of the ICWA.
Comments on In re C.B. CA3