legal news


Register | Forgot Password

B.C. v. Superior Court CA4/3
The court terminated B.C.’s (mother) reunification services and set a permanency hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 (.26 hearing). Subsequently, mother filed a petition pursuant to section 388 (388 petition) to change that ruling. The court denied the petition. It found mother had shown a change of circumstances in that she had maintained sobriety over a lengthy period. However, the court found that changing the order would not be in the best interests of the child. We find no abuse of discretion and deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale