legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Behle v. Tanner CA2/8
The complaint that underlies this appeal arose from a series of events related to defendant, Lisa Tanner’s, dispute with her estranged husband, Michael Tanner, who was in a postseparation romantic relationship with plaintiff. Defendant made a special motion to strike this complaint pursuant to California’s “anti-SLAPP” statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. The trial court denied the special motion, finding that the case did not involve protected speech. Applying the required de novo standard of review, we agree and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale