Broten v. Target Corporation CA4/1
Plaintiff and appellant Kirk Broten sued his former employer, defendant and respondent Target Corporation, for several causes of action, including retaliation and wrongful termination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code, sections 12900 et seq., 12965 (FEHA). A jury found by special verdict that Target had two "substantial motivating" reasons to discharge Broten: his complaint of harassment, and his poor job performance, and awarded no damages. After trial, Target moved for costs. Broten moved to strike and tax Target's costs. The court granted Broten's motion to tax in part and denied it in part. Broten also unsuccessfully moved for his attorney fees under FEHA.
Comments on Broten v. Target Corporation CA4/1