legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cruz CA2/3
Wilfredo Cruz appeals from his conviction and sentence for the murder of Norman Earl Edwards. Cruz contends the prosecutor committed misconduct in her closing argument by misstating the law defining deliberation and premeditation and by arguing facts she had not proved. Cruz also contends his trial lawyer was constitutionally ineffective in failing to object to this misconduct. In a supplemental brief, Cruz asks us to remand his case to the trial court for the court to consider whether to strike the firearm enhancement under Senate Bill 620, which took effect on January 1, 2018.
We find no error in the prosecutor’s closing argument, and therefore affirm Cruz’s conviction. We remand the case to the trial court for the court to exercise its discretion to strike or to decline to strike the punishment imposed for Cruz’s intentional discharge of a firearm causing Edwards’s death.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale