P. v. Small CA2/2
Charles Small (defendant) stands convicted of raping and orally copulating his girlfriend’s 16-year-old daughter. On appeal, he argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting expert testimony that the victim’s somewhat counterintuitive behavior during and after the sexual assault was “not inconsistent” with that of a person who had, in fact, been subject to an unwanted sexual assault. We conclude there was no abuse of discretion, and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Small CA2/2