Edler v. Robson
Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to compel arbitration of the dispute in the instant case. Although enforcement of arbitration agreements is favored, respondents contend that denial of the arbitration petition was appropriate in this case, for three reasons. First, they argue that no enforceable arbitration agreement was entered into, as the purported agreement was contained in a document not signed by any party. Second, they argue that several of the claims asserted do not fall within the scope of those agreements. Third, the Edlers assert Robson waived any right to compel arbitration by participating in proceedings before the trial court. Court found none of these contentions persuasive. The court’s order denying his petition to compel arbitration is reversed.
Comments on Edler v. Robson