legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Pilley v. Harris CA4/1
This appeal arises from a dispute over the disposition of the estate of James E. Pilley (Pilley). Pilley was the sole shareholder of a business that operated two residential care facilities. In 2004, Pilley decided to sell one of the facilities and set up a trust, the Pilley Investment Trust (PITv1), to hold the proceeds of the sale, in order to reduce the taxes associated with the sale. Pilley transferred the real property of the facility to the trust and the trustees, Edward and Jayne Pilley, and sold the facility for $1.5 million. Pilley and the PITv1 trustees then executed a private annuity agreement (the PAA), by which the trustees agreed to assign back to Pilley the $600,000 that the trust had received as the down payment for the property, and to pay Pilley the remaining $900,000 from the sale in installments.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale