legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Natalie E. v. Sup. Ct.
Appellant petitions for a writ of mandate to vacate an order setting a permanency planning hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Appellant argues the evidence is insufficient to support findings that it would be detrimental to return the child to her care and that reasonable services were offered to her. Court disagreed and denied the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale