Godoy v. Universal Switching Co. CA2/5
Plaintiff and appellant Imelda Godoy appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Universal Switching Corporation following a bench trial in this action for failure to accommodate a disability and failure to engage in the interactive process under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Government Code section 12900 et seq.). Godoy contends on appeal that her request for accommodation was reasonable because she could have been reassigned to a vacant position for a mechanical assembler in January 2015. We conclude substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that there was no vacant position in January 2015 to which Godoy could have been reassigned, and therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on Godoy v. Universal Switching Co. CA2/5