Marriage of Wintemute and Soltan CA4/3
This is the second appeal in this case. Soltan’s first appeal was from a judgment entered in June 2014 after she and her ex-husband, Eric Wintemute, had settled numerous issues of property division at the end of a month-long trial. Notwithstanding the comprehensive nature of the settlement agreement, Soltan wanted to keep on litigating. We affirmed the judgment, observing that “[o]ne point is clear from the record. The settlement was a global one; there were no remaining issues.”
Now Soltan has returned, after at least 10 more trial court hearings – hearings punctuated by remarks from the bench such as “absurd,” “unbelievable,” “delay and delay and delay,” “out of control,” “disingenuous” and “filled with inaccuracies” when referring to declarations filed under penalty of perjury, and thinly-veiled findings that Soltan and her counsel were lying. Soltan asks us to review both appealable and nonappealable issues, without even a nod toward the sta
Comments on Marriage of Wintemute and Soltan CA4/3