legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Olague CA4/3
A jury convicted defendant Christopher Raymond Olague of two sex offenses against Jane Doe One (counts one and two), intimidating her from being a witness (count three), and possessing child pornography (count six). The jury acquitted defendant of two sex offenses against Jane Doe Two (counts four and five). The trial court sentenced defendant to two years and eight months, plus 15 years to life in prison.
Defendant claims there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions for the sex offenses against Jane Doe One (kidnapping for the purpose of child molestation and child molestation). We disagree.
Defendant also claims that he was improperly held to answer for the alleged crimes against Jane Doe Two (child molestation and inducing a minor to engage in sexual conduct for a photograph), the trial court improperly refused to sever those two counts, and the court improperly admitted illicit photographs of Jane Doe Two. Again, we disagree.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale