In re C.M. CA3
C. M. (minor) appeals from the juvenile court’s adjudication finding true various firearm and drug violations. He contends: (1) the court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a traffic stop because the officer unlawfully prolonged the stop; (2) the court erred by admitting his custodial confession because he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his Miranda rights; and (3) he asks us to review the sealed records from an in camera Pitchess hearing to determine whether the trial court erred when, after reviewing the records, it found no discoverable information.
We reject minor’s contentions and affirm.
To avoid duplication, we explain the relevant facts as we discuss each contention.
Comments on In re C.M. CA3