In re J.R. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, R.L. (Mother), has eight children. Defendant and appellant, J.R. (Father), is the father of the youngest six of Mother’s eight children.
In the first of these consolidated appeals, in case No. E068478, Mother appeals from the juvenile court’s May 18, 2017, order summarily denying Mother’s Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition without a hearing. In that appeal, Mother claims the court erroneously failed to hold a hearing on the petition, in order to determine whether, as Mother was claiming, plaintiff and respondent, San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS), violated the relative placement preference (§ 361.3) in failing to reassess the maternal aunt, M.G., for placement of Mother’s youngest five children, in February 2017.
In the second appeal, in case No. E069180, Mother and Father appeal the August 18, 2017, orders terminating parental rights to their youngest two children, twin girls M.J.R. and M.R.R.
Comments on In re J.R. CA4/2