legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Linares CA2/8
We affirm appellant’s conviction of three felony charges: first degree residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459; count 1), making a criminal threat (§ 422, subd. (a); count 2), and attempting to dissuade a witness (§ 136.1, subd. (a)(2); count 4). We find that the trial court did not prejudicially err in admitting and excluding portions of telephone calls appellant made while incarcerated. We also find that appellant’s right to a public trial was not violated by the trial court’s limited exclusion of a small child during the playing of a portion of a jailhouse telephone call. We further find the trial court was correct in admitting “other acts” evidence pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1101, subdivision (b), and 1109, that there was no prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct, that a witness did not render an improper opinion, and that there was no instructional error.
We do, however, reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale