Rusnak v. Laikin CA2/7
Taroub Rusnak sued Janice Salaman and Daniel Laikin, alleging Salaman had fraudulently transferred $1.75 million to a company established by Laikin in an effort to avoid paying a judgment entered against Rusnak. Following a bench trial the court entered judgment against Laikin, awarding Rusnak $1.75 million in compensatory damages, $848,438.36 in prejudgment interest, $1 million in punitive damages and attorney fees of $95,067.50. On appeal Laikin contends the court’s ruling was not supported by substantial evidence and challenges the legal bases for certain aspects of its decision. We affirm.
Comments on Rusnak v. Laikin CA2/7