legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Clark CA2/7
By means of a plea agreement, Megan Clark pleaded nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and admitted three prior convictions of the same offense within the meaning of section 11370.2. She requests that this court independently review the record pursuant to People v. Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal.4th 948 (Hobbs) to determine whether the trial court erred when it sealed portions of the search warrant and denied her motion to quash and traverse the warrant. In supplemental briefing, she argues that the sentence enhancements imposed for her prior convictions under section 11370.2 must be stricken. We strike the section 11370.2 sentence enhancements and otherwise affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale