P. v. Houston CA3
Defendant Alamar Cyril Houston appeals from numerous convictions arising from his hitting four people while driving a stolen vehicle. He contends (1) the trial court violated his right to present a defense when it excluded three witnesses; (2) defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not making a Romero request to strike a strike prior; and (3) the court erred when it stayed, instead of struck, a prior prison term enhancement that was based on the strike prior. Except to remand for the trial court to strike the prior prison term enhancement, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Houston CA3