legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Houston CA3
Defendant Alamar Cyril Houston appeals from numerous convictions arising from his hitting four people while driving a stolen vehicle. He contends (1) the trial court violated his right to present a defense when it excluded three witnesses; (2) defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not making a Romero request to strike a strike prior; and (3) the court erred when it stayed, instead of struck, a prior prison term enhancement that was based on the strike prior. Except to remand for the trial court to strike the prior prison term enhancement, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale