P. v. Mota CA3
A jury found defendant Daniel Harrison Mota guilty of transporting methamphetamine for sale, and the trial court imposed the upper term. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in not instructing the jury on simple possession as a lesser included offense. He also challenges the imposition of the upper term, arguing he did not commit his crime with planning, sophistication, or professionalism. We will order a corrected abstract of judgment and otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Mota CA3