legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Mary Anne H. v. Superior Court CA4/1
Mary Anne H. and Jarred W. seek review of juvenile court orders setting hearings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to select a permanency plan for their children. They assert that Mary Anne did not receive reasonable family reunification services. Mary Anne contends that the court erroneously excluded the attachments to her declaration and improperly admitted the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency's (Agency) report in evidence. She asks this court to reverse the orders setting section 366.26 hearings and to reinstate her reunification services. Jarred argues that the court erred in denying Mary Anne's requests for continuances and granting the Agency's request for a continuance, by disregarding and not ruling on his objections, and by admitting the social study report in evidence.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale