legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Joshua J. CA1/4
In this dependency appeal, J.J. (mother) challenges dispositional orders made pursuant to subdivision (b)(6) of section 361.5, denying her the chance to reunify with her infant son, Joshua (born June 2016). Specifically, mother asserts that the juvenile court failed to state the factual basis for its bypass finding and that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s determination that it would not benefit Joshua to pursue reunification services with her. Mother additionally challenges the juvenile court’s failure to consider placing Joshua with the maternal grandparents at disposition. Concluding that ample evidence supports the juvenile court’s bypass order, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale