P. v. Gomez CA2/5
Defendant and appellant Aramis Arango Gomez (defendant) was convicted by a jury of nine crimes: carjacking, robbery, attempted robbery, and six counts of false imprisonment committed in the course of the attempted robbery. The crimes that formed the basis of the charges occurred on three separate dates over a two-week period in the neighborhood where defendant lived. Defendant does not challenge his carjacking conviction, so we consider only whether the other convictions should be reversed because they are supported by insufficient evidence, were influenced by improper lay opinion identification testimony, or were the product of a prejudicial joinder of charges.
Comments on P. v. Gomez CA2/5