In re T.M. CA3
S.M. (mother) and R.R. (father), parents of the minors, appeal from the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26 & 395; unless otherwise set forth, statutory section references that follow are to this code.)
The parents collectively contend (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding that M.M. would likely be adopted; (2) the court erred in finding the beneficial parental relationship exception to adoption did not apply; (3) the court erred in finding the sibling bond exception to adoption did not apply; (4) the court abused its discretion in granting the motion to quash subpoenas for two of the minors, M.M. and A.M.; and (5) the court erred in denying mother’s request for a bonding study. Mother further asserts that if this court finds her request for a bonding study was untimely, then we should find her attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel.
Comments on In re T.M. CA3