P. v. Lomas CA6
Defendant Roy Lomas pleaded no contest to possession of child pornography (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a)) and was placed on three years of probation in March 2015. The trial court imposed the probation condition mandated by section 1203.067, subdivision (b)(4), which requires the probationer to waive the psychotherapist-patient privilege. However, in response to defendant’s objections, it declined to impose the probation condition mandated by section 1203.067, subdivision (b)(3), which requires the probationer to waive the privilege against self-incrimination in connection with the sex offender management program. The trial court overruled the prosecution’s objection to the court’s omission of the section 1203.067, subdivision (b)(3) condition.
Comments on P. v. Lomas CA6