P. v. Philmlee CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Russell Philmlee (defendant) appeals from his assault convictions, contending that substantial evidence did not support the judgment, that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his prior convictions of rape and forcible oral copulation, and that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to impeach his credibility with his two prior convictions of failing to register as a sex offender. Finding defendant’s contentions to be without merit or that any error was harmless, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Philmlee CA2/2