Gharmalkar v. Fisher CA2/6
In this personal injury action arising out of a vehicular collision, Anil D. Gharmalkar appeals from the judgment entered in favor of respondents Jose Everett Fisher, Ismael Rodriguez, and Coastal Fumigation, Inc. A jury returned a special verdict finding that respondents’ conduct was not a substantial factor in causing harm to appellant.
Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that a new trial is warranted because (1) the trial court refused to permit the jury to watch a video of a vehicular crash test, (2) the trial court refused to give a requested jury instruction, and (3) respondents’ counsel committed misconduct during closing argument. We affirm.
Comments on Gharmalkar v. Fisher CA2/6