legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Olascoaga CA4/1
Jose Olascoaga pleaded guilty to unlawfully exhibiting a firearm in a threatening manner to an occupant of a motor vehicle (Pen. Code, § 417.3) and exhibiting a deadly weapon, a misdemeanor (§ 417, subd. (a)(1)). As part of a negotiated plea, the trial court sentenced Olascoaga to three years of probation and 20 days of public work service. Upon successful completion of probation, the court agreed to dismiss the felony section 417.3 charge on the condition that if Olascoaga violated any condition of probation he would subject himself to up to three years in prison and four years of parole.
Olascoaga challenges 10 probation conditions as unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Additionally, he challenges three conditions as unreasonable under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481, 486 (Lent). As we shall discuss, we agree with his Lent challenges but reject his constitutional challenges.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale