Nsejjere v. Mann CA2/5
Plaintiff Isaac Nsejjere was unsuccessful in two actions against MannKind Corporation. In the first action, the trial court sustained without leave to amend MannKind’s demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint (FAC), asserting contract and promissory estoppel claims. Plaintiff then filed a second action against MannKind and its principal, Alfred E. Mann, for promissory fraud. The trial court sustained without leave to amend defendants’ demurrer to that complaint as well.
Plaintiff appealed from the ensuing judgments, and we consolidated the appeals. Having independently reviewed both records (Stearn v. County of San Bernardino (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 434, 439), we conclude as a matter of law the operative pleadings do not state facts sufficient to state a cause of action. We therefore affirm.
Comments on Nsejjere v. Mann CA2/5