P. v. Christian
A jury found defendant guilty of three counts of robbery and found two firearm enhancement allegations true. Defendant timely appealed, contending the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress his statement to the police because: 1) the statement was not voluntary; and 2) the interrogation began before he was given Miranda warnings. After reviewing the record and the interrogation videotape, the court concluded that the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion. Accordingly, court affirmed the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Christian