P. v. Colyar CA6
Appellant James Colyar seeks review of an order extending his civil commitment to Napa State Hospital pursuant to Penal Code section 1026.5. Appellant contends that the order was based on expert testimony derived from case-specific hearsay, which was inadmissible under judicial authority decided after the order was filed. We conclude that the admission of the challenged evidence was not prejudicial. We will therefore affirm the order extending appellant’s commitment.
Comments on P. v. Colyar CA6