legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.R. CA1/3
A.R. appeals from a juvenile court order declaring him a ward of the court and placing him on probation after he pleaded no contest to a charge of felony sexual battery. His sole contention on appeal is that a probation condition prohibiting him from viewing, possessing, or distributing any sexually explicit or pornographic images is unconstitutionally vague. The People concede the matter must be remanded for the juvenile court to modify the challenged condition. We agree that remand is appropriate to permit the juvenile court to define the material prohibited by the pornography condition with greater precision.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale