legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Decision Diagnostics v. Girardi CA2/4
Appellants Decision Diagnostics Corporation, Keith Berman (its president), and Pharmatech Solutions, Inc. (a subsidiary) filed a complaint for malicious prosecution and abuse of process against respondents Matthew D. Girardi, his law firm (The Girardi Law Firm, LLP), Emily Corporation and Joseph DiFabio (Emily’s president). Respondents filed a cross-complaint alleging, among other claims, that appellants had defamed Girardi by posting libelous statements on a public website. Appellants filed a special motion to strike the defamation claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP motion). The trial court initially granted the anti-SLAPP motion, but after further consideration, denied the motion. Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying the anti-SLAPP motion. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the defamation claim did not arise out of activities protected under section 425.16. Accordingly, we affirm .

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale