In re J.C. CA2/6
In 164 page “briefs” accompanied by over 450 footnotes G.V. (mother) seeks review of claims that she received ineffective assistance from her trial counsel whom the juvenile court declined to remove, that the court abused its discretion in denying her request for a contested hearing on a proposed permanent plan and bypassing family reunification services, and that substantial evidence does not support the termination of her parental rights. We decline to revisit her claim that she received ineffective assistance of counsel and the court’s refusal to grant her “Marsden Motion.” We previously rejected these claims in a prior opinion in G.V. v. Superior Court (In re J.C.) (Jul. 10, 2017, B281501) [nonpub. opn.]. She has had her day in court and she lost.
Mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to eight-year old J.C. and one-year old A.M. (Welf. & Inst. Code §366.26.) Mother has a history of substance abuse and involvement with the dependency syste
Comments on In re J.C. CA2/6