legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. King CA3
A jury convicted defendant Dale King of possession of methamphetamine for sale. In bifurcated proceedings, the trial court found true allegations of four prior prison terms and a prior drug conviction. The trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate prison term of 11 years.
Defendant now contends (1) defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to object to an expert’s interpretation of his jail call, and (2) the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the procedure for considering the lesser included offense of simple possession. We find no merit in the contentions.
In supplemental briefing, defendant asserts (3) that the three-year enhancement imposed for his prior drug conviction must be stricken pursuant to a recent amendment to Health and Safety Code section 11370.2. The People agree, and we do too. We will modify the judgment to strike the three-year enhancement imposed for defendant’s prior drug conviction, and affirm the judgment as modifie

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale