Marriage of Cappello
Wife appeals from the order modifying the amount of monthly spousal support paid by her former husband, from $11,727 to zero, while reserving jurisdiction. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion because Husband did not prove a material change of circumstances to justify the modification, because the order requires her to liquidate her entire estate including her primary residence, and because the trial court improperly considered loan applications she made to purchase or refinance investment properties. Appellant further contends the trial court erred when it refused to increase spousal support and when it denied her request for an award of attorney fees.
Court observed that while appellant presents the contentions as errors of law, they involve questions of fact. They were resolved adversely to her by the trial court which expressly ruled that she lacked credibility. Court affirmed.
Comments on Marriage of Cappello