P. v. Palmer CA4/2
Defendants and appellants, Darrell Lamarr Palmer and Christopher Michael Chiarizio (defendants), appeal from the judgments entered following jury convictions for discharge of a firearm with gross negligence and assault with a firearm. Defendants were also each separately convicted of making criminal threats. The jury further found true that Chiarizio personally discharged a firearm. In a bifurcated trial, the jury found true that Palmer had two prior strike convictions (§§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and a prison prior (§ 667.5).
Comments on P. v. Palmer CA4/2