P. v. McGill CA5
Appointed counsel for defendant Mario Anthony McGill asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We sent a letter to defendant, advising him of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant did not respond. On review, we consider whether the trial court properly denied defendant’s petitions/applications for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.18. We conclude it did and we find no other arguable issues on appeal.
We provide the following brief description of the factual and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On March 1, 2013, in case No. BF146594A, the Kern County District Attorney charged defendant with willfully driving or taking a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)) and receiving a stolen vehicle (§ 496d, subd. (a)). Various other allegations were inc
Comments on P. v. McGill CA5