P. v. Gould CA1/2
Defendant Derek Gould appeals from a judgment of conviction of two counts of misdemeanor receiving stolen property and three felony firearm offenses, entered after a jury trial. He contends he should have been convicted of only one count of receiving stolen property and that the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument. We agree that defendant should have been convicted of only one count of receiving stolen property and otherwise affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Gould CA1/2