P. v. Chahal CA1/3
In 2014 Gurbaksh Chahal was placed on probation for misdemeanor domestic violence and battery involving victim Juliet K. In 2016 the court revoked Chahal’s probation after another domestic violence incident with a different victim, S.B. Chahal appeals the revocation order, and contends the court erred when it (1) admitted a hearsay statement from S.B. pursuant to Evidence Code section 1370; (2) admitted previously suppressed video surveillance footage depicting the violent incident with Juliet K.; (3) excluded defense evidence offered to challenge S.B.’s credibility; and (4) ruled on the admissibility of conditionally admitted exhibits after, rather than before, closing arguments. None of Chahal’s arguments have merit, so we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Chahal CA1/3