legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Douglas v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/5
After the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board (rent board) denied their petitions, certain tenants of the Midtown Park Apartments petitioned for writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) in San Francisco Superior Court, alleging their tenancies are subject to San Francisco’s Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (rent ordinance). The superior court sustained the City of San Francisco’s (City) demurrer to the operative first amended writ petition and entered judgment for the City.
Tenants appeal. They claim their tenancies are protected by the rent ordinance because their rents were not “controlled or regulated by any government unit, agency or authority” between February and May 2014. (S.F. Admin. Code, ch. 37, § 37.2, subd. (r)(4).) We disagree and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale