In re D.B. CA1/2
D.B. (Minor), who had been the subject of four previous sustained wardship petitions filed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, admitted allegations in a later petition that he committed grand theft of a firearm. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (d)(2).) He appeals from two provisions of the juvenile court’s disposition orders. He argues that the court abused its discretion by committing him to the Challenge Academy at juvenile hall. He also argues that the court violated his due process rights by stating that he is prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm until the age of 30, because the prohibition is not authorized for the offense of grand theft of a firearm. We find no abuse of discretion, and, because the firearm prohibition had been properly imposed in the disposition of an earlier offense, we find no violation of due process. Therefore, we shall affirm.
Comments on In re D.B. CA1/2