Dumas v. Wells CA2/5
Defendant and appellant Anthony Wells appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Jose Dumas in this action arising from a failed real estate transaction and business loan. Wells contends the judgment must be reversed because (1) there is no substantial evidence to support a finding of promissory fraud or fraud under Civil Code section 1572, subdivision 5; (2) there is no substantial evidence of a civil conspiracy to commit fraud; and (3) Dumas acted with unclean hands and an illegality of purpose. We modify the judgment to reduce the amount in damages awarded to Dumas, and affirm the judgment as modified.
Comments on Dumas v. Wells CA2/5