Zendel v. The Hertz Corp. CA2/5
The trial court dismissed without prejudice the action brought by plaintiff and appellant Azita Zendel against the Hertz Corporation. Zendel, who represents herself, repeatedly failed to follow rules of procedure, culminating with her failure to file and serve a second amended complaint (SAC) as directed within 20 days after an order sustaining Hertz’s demurrer with leave to amend. Zendel’s adherence to the rules on appeal fares no better, as she has filed an appellant’s appendix and brief that do not comply with the rules of court, and Zendel has not included in the record on appeal reporter’s transcripts or suitable substitutes of hearings at which arguments were considered, conflicting evidence was weighed, and discretionary rulings were made. We modify the judgment to reflect that the dismissal is with prejudice, but otherwise affirm.
Comments on Zendel v. The Hertz Corp. CA2/5