In re J.G. CA2/4
Minor J.G. appeals from the denial of his petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 to be moved from his current foster placement to the foster home that houses his three brothers. He contends the dependency court abused its discretion in failing to grant a full evidentiary hearing on his petition. He further argues that the court erred in finding he had not met his burden to show a change of circumstances and that it would be in his best interests to move. Faced with the decision between two potentially beneficial homes, we find the court did not abuse its discretion in determining it would be in J.G.’s best interest to remain in the foster placement where he was doing well and had spent most of his young life. We therefore affirm.
Comments on In re J.G. CA2/4