P. v. Nguyen CA1/1
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of first degree burglary, misdemeanor theft, and misdemeanor trespass. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is the trial court erroneously instructed the jury with CALCRIM No. 376, “Possession of Recently Stolen Property as Evidence of a Crime.” We reject defendant’s claim and affirm.

Comments on P. v. Nguyen CA1/1

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced