P. v. Rocha CA2/8
Defendant Julio Cesar Rocha appeals his convictions for two counts of resisting arrest and one count of assault. Defendant argues that the trial court erred when it failed pursuant to Penal Code section 654 to stay the sentence for one of the resisting arrest convictions. We affirm because defendant had different intents when resisting arrest and committing the assault. Per defendant’s request we have independently reviewed the Pitchess hearing and find no error.
Comments on P. v. Rocha CA2/8