P. v. Roberson CA2/3
Defendant and appellant Dominick Blair Roberson appeals his convictions for multiple counts of second degree robbery and attempted robbery. He raises a variety of claims of error related to the prosecution’s evidence that he wore eyeglasses at trial in an attempt to change his appearance. He further contends the prosecutor committed misconduct by misstating the standard of proof; the trial court erred by admitting a DNA expert’s testimony; and the trial court’s conduct impermissibly created the impression it was aligned with the prosecution, thereby violating his due process rights to a fair trial. Discerning no prejudicial error, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Roberson CA2/3