legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sanders v. PNC Bank CA4/38
Marshall S. Sanders and Lydia O. Sanders appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants PNC Bank, N.A., doing business as PNC Mortgage (PNC), and Bank of America, N.A. However, Marshall Sanders’s opening brief, which is a virtual clone of an earlier opening brief we ordered stricken, is devoid of any statement of facts, cogent legal argument, or citations to the lengthy appellate record. The brief does contain an impressive table of contents, but unfortunately that table bears no relationship to the content of the brief itself.
Sanders’s opening brief fails even to acknowledge that the judgment he challenges was the product of a motion for summary judgment, let alone provide any analysis of why the trial court might have erred in granting that motion. Accordingly, Sanders has failed to meet his appellate burden, and we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale