legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.T. CA2/1
Appellant B.T. (Mother) appeals from juvenile court orders denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and terminating her parental rights under section 366.26 with respect to her son, N.T. (born November 2014). Mother maintains that she satisfied her burden under section 388 to establish changed circumstances and best interests to warrant either resumption of reunification services or return of N.T. to her custody, and that the juvenile court therefore erred in denying her petition. She further contends that in the event we reverse the order denying her petition, we must also reverse the order terminating her parental rights. We conclude that Mother has not demonstrated error and therefore affirm both orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale